괧괥괥괪봏궻맊둉먰롎깋깛긌깛긐귩랷뛩궸몜뫮밒]돽귩궢궲깋깛긌깛긐귩띿맟궢궲귒궫갃@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@볷{궻TKX먰롎궼90렜댥뤵궻FCS갂뻞뚥쀍갂@벍쀍귩뾎궢궲궋귡궻궳맊둉밒]돽궼괨댧댥볙궼둴렳갃땆뢱밒궸뭯귢궲궋귡긽깑긇긫먰롎댥뤵궻]돽궼벦귞귢귡궳궢귛궎갃
귝궯궲맊둉밒]돽궼괧댧![]()
덇뺴갂깑긏깒[깑먰롎궻뼰뭚깋귽긜깛긚궻듰뜎K2궼괫댧댥돷뙂믦![]()
뿤똓뜎됄듰뜎궻렔뫖륲궼볦묈뽩궴궴귖궸뤔렪궳궥궺갃
1. M1A2 SEP Abrams (System Enhancement Package) / General Dynamics Land Systems Division / USA
@@2.TKX/TRD/JAPAN
3. Merkava Mark IV / The Israel Ordnance Corps / Israel

4. Type 90 / Mitsubishi Heavy Industries / Japan

5. Leopard 2A6 / Krauss-Maffei Wegmann / Germany
5. Challenger 2 / Vickers Defence Systems Division / United Kingdom
Forecast International Re-evaluates Main Battle Tank Market
Ranks M1A2 SEP Abrams
World갋s Best Combat Tank
PARIS , [June 14, 2004] 갏 In light of the global war on terror and Operation Iraqi Freedom , the Forecast International Weapons Group has re-evaluated its annual ranking of the world갋s best main battle tanks. With an unmatched combat record in Operation Desert Storm (1991) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003-present) , the M1A1 Abrams by General Dynamics Land Systems Division has clearly proven itself to be the premier main battle tank in service today. Based on its combat debut with the U.S. 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized) during Operation Iraqi Freedom , the M1A2 SEP (System Enhancement Package) Abrams now sets the international standard for main battle tank performance.
긬깏갂[2004봏6뙉14볷]\ 긡깓궴귽깋긏궻렔뾕띿먰궸궓궚귡멣맊둉먰몚궻듡_궔귞갂Forecast궻뜎띧빜딇됛Group궼맊둉덇롥먰벉먰롎궻봏궸덇뱗궻깋깛긌깛긐귩띋]돽궢귏궢궫갃띀뵗궻뿋띿먰(1991)궴귽깋긏궻렔뾕띿먰(뙸띪궻2003)궸귝귡뾆귢궫먰벉딯^궳갂[긨깋깑갋_귽긥~긞긏긚Land Systems럷떾븫궸귝귡M1A1긄귽긳깋긛궼갂궩귢렔뫬궕뜞볷럊뾭뭷궻띍뛼궻롥먰벉먰롎궳궇귡궴뼻둴궸뿧뤪궢귏궢궫갃귽깋긏궻렔뾕띿먰궻듩궻빫뜎묉4Infantry럷떾븫(@둆돸궠귢궲궋귡)궴궻먰벉긢긮깄[궸딈궱궋궲갂M1A2 SEP(긘긚긡Enhancement긬긞긑[긙)긄귽긳깋긛궼뙸띪갂롥먰벉먰롎맜\궸맊둉딮둰귩먠믦궢귏궥갃
갣With the demands of the global war on terror , we no longer have the luxury of evaluating weapons systems solely on their performance in the safe confines of a training environment , 갥 said Dean Lockwood , author of the Forecast International rankings. 갣For man and machine alike , combat has a way of revealing previously unknown strengths and weaknesses , 갥 Lockwood said.
걏긡깓궻멣맊둉먰몚궻뾴땫궸귝궯궲갂럡궫궭궼귖궎긣깒[긦깛긐듏떕궻댝멣궶떕둉궸뾄덇붯귞궻맜\궻궴궖궸븧딇뫬똭귩]돽궥귡궨궋궫궘귩렃궯궲궋귏궧귪갃걐궴갂깓긞긏긂긞긤둾븫뮮(Forecast궻뜎띧깋깛긌깛긐궻띿롌)궼뙻궋귏궢궫갃 걏릐귖}긘깛궸듫궢궲귖갂먰벉궸궼갂뙭궶댥멟궸뼟뭢궻뮮룋궴뭒룋궻벞궕궇귟귏궥갃걐궴갂깓긞긏긂긞긤궼뙻궋귏궢궫갃
When viewed through the prism of actual combat performance , the annual main battle tank ranking takes on a radically different character from years past. The Israel Ordnance Corps Merkava Mark IV moves up to second place in the Forecast International ranking. Although generally considered to be outside the mainstream of international tank development , the Merkava series is uniquely suited for the demands of the Israeli security environment. Like the M1A1 Abrams , the Merkava can boast a proven combat record.
렳먰맜\궻긵깏긛귩믅궢궲뙥귞귢귡궴갂봏궸덇뱗궻롥먰벉먰롎깋깛긌깛긐궼뜧{밒궸돺봏귖댶궶궯궫긌긿깋긏^[귩됡궗궲뚖궋귏궥갃귽긚깋긄깑궻븧딇됆Merkava}[긏IV궼Forecast궻뜎띧깋깛긌깛긐궸궓궚귡2댧궸뤵뤈궢귏궢궫갃 뜎띧밒궶먰롎둎뵯궻롥뿬봦궻둖궸궇귡궴덇붗궸뛩궑귞귢귏궥궕갂Merkava긘깏[긛궼뾄덇귽긚깋긄깑궻렊댝듏떕궻뾴땫궸뜃궯궲궋귏궥갃 M1A1긄귽긳깋긛궻귝궎궸갂Merkava궼뿧뤪궠귢궫먰벉딯^귩뚓귡궞궴궕궳궖귏궥갃
Japan갋s Type 90, by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries , maintains its third-place position on the Forecast International list. Drawing heavily on German Leopard 2 technology , the Type 90 is arguably the most technologically advanced main battle tank in service today. However , the Type 90 suffers from being untried in combat. As such , its performance remains essentially theoretical. For the same reason , the Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Leopard 2A6 falls to fourth place. The oft-praised advanced features of the Leopard 2 and the integration of the Rh 120/55 main armament simply cannot compensate for the fact that the Leopard 2A6 remains untested in the crucible of combat.
랳뷝뢣뛊떾맶갂볷{궻Type90궼갂Forecast궻뜎띧깏긚긣궳3댧궻댧뭫궳궇귡궴롥뮗궢귏궥갃 묈궋궸긤귽긟궻Leopard2땆뢱귩뿕뾭궢궲갂Type90궼뜞볷럊뾭뭷궻_뤪뤵갂띍귖땆뢱밒궸뛼뱗궶롥먰벉먰롎궳궥갃궢궔궢궶궕귞갂Type90궼먰벉궳렳{궠귢궲궋궶궋궻궸뗪궢귒귏궥갃 궩궎궋궎귖궻궴궢궲갂맜\궼{렲밒궸궼뿚_뤵궻귏귏궳럄궯궲궋귏궥갃 벏궣뿚뾕궔귞갂긏깋긂긚-}긲긃귽Wegmann Leopard 2A6궼갂4붥뽞궸볺뤮궥귡궫귕궸뿇궭귏궥갃 Leopard2궻궢궽궢궽뤝^궠귢궫뛼뱗궶벫뮙궴Rh120/55롥뺺궻뱷뜃궼뭁궸갂Leopard 2A6궕먰벉궻귡궰귍궸럫궠귢궲궋궶궋귏귏궳럄궯궲궋귡궴궋궎럷렳귩뺚궎궞궴궕궳궖귏궧귪갃
Fifth place on the Forecast International ranking belongs to the British Challenger 2 by Vickers Defence Systems Division. Like the Abrams , the Challenger 2 has earned a solid combat record during Operation Iraqi Freedom. In comparison with the other tanks on this list , however , the Challenger 2 suffers from the lack of NATO-standard ordnance. Should the U.K. Ministry of Defence adopt the NATO-standard 120mm Rh 120 ordnance as part of the Challenger Lethality Improvement Program (CLIP) , the Challenger 2 will likely take over second place on this list.
Forecast궻뜎띧깋깛긌깛긐궻5댧궼긮긞긇[긛Defence Systems럷떾븫궳귽긎깏긚궻Challenger2궸뫌궢귏궥갃긄귽긳깋긛궻귝궎궸갂Challenger2궼귽깋긏궻렔뾕띿먰궻듩갂둴렳궶먰벉딯^귩벦궲궋귏궥갃 궢궔궢궶궕귞갂궞궻깏긚긣궻뤵궻뫜궻^깛긏궴궻붶둹궳궼갂Challenger2궼NATO뷭궻묈뺺궻븉뫉궕뙁_궳궥갃귽긎깏긚궻뎟뜎뻞뤙궕Challenger Lethality Improvement Program(CLIP)궻덇븫궴궢궲120mm궻NATO뷭궻Rh120묈뺺귩띖뾭궥귡궴갂Challenger2궼궓궩귞궘궞궻깏긚긣궻2댧귩렃궯궲뛱궘궳궢귛궎갃
듰뜎궻렔뫖륲K2먰롎궼6댧댥돷궳OK w